Research Article

A Contextual Analysis of Documentary Film as a Product and Tool for Academic Exercise

Abdul Rashid Gbambu
Lecturer, Department of Communication, Innovation and Technology, Faculty of Communication and Media Studies, University for Development Studies, Ghana
* Corresponding author
Jemilatu Saaka Dramani
Lecturer, Department of Journalism, Faculty of Communication and Media Studies, University for Development Studies, Ghana
Morolake Omowumi Adekunle
Dean, School of Journalism and Digital Media, University of the Gambia, The Gambia
DOI icon 10.24018/ejmedia.2023.2.4.22

Read Counter
2342

Downloads
1176

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2023-08-17
Published 2023-10-27

Read counter = 2342 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

This paper examines the justifications for using documentary film as a product of academic exercise, using the films "Return of the Biblical Plague: Mosquitoes" and "Bitter Lake" as case studies. Through an analysis of the production and reception of these films, the paper explores how documentary can be used to visually tell stories that follow the replicability of academic research procedures, from the selection of subject matter and site to planning and interviewing subjects to data collection and analysis. The paper also addresses the challenges and ethical considerations associated with using documentary film as an academic exercise, including representation, power, and objectivity issues. Ultimately, the paper argues that documentary films have the potential to enhance academic exercise by providing a compelling, engaging medium through which to explore complex issues and promote critical thinking. The paper is structured into four segments of analysis. The initial segment encompasses the foundational aspects of documentary film production, which involves establishing the core argument and exploring its historical contexts. The subsequent segment delves into research as a reproducible methodology, establishing empirical evidence concerning a particular phenomenon. The third part also examines the essence of the documentary film-making process, accompanied by a comparative analysis juxtaposed with research as a scientific procedural endeavor, including the analysis of two documentary films, "The Biblical Plague" and "Bitter Lake". Using the Auteur film theory, the final segment centers on, culminating in a comprehensive conclusion that substantiates the contention that documentary film-making serves as both a creative output and a valuable tool within the realm of academic exploration.

Keywords: Academic exercise documentary film film production research

References

  1. Aitken, I., & McDonald, D. (2013). The companion to British and Irish cinema. John Wiley & Sons.
     Google Scholar
  2. Aufderheide, P. (2007). Documentary film: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
     Google Scholar
  3. Backes, J., Ostwald, H., & von Schwind, C. (Directors) (2007). Return of the Bible Plagues Part 2: Mosquitoes (Duration: 51:12). Taglicht Media, Pre TV (Firm), ZDF Enterprises, SBS-TV. Australia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjujC36Qrv8.
     Google Scholar
  4. Barna, K., & Szabó, D. (2018). Documentary films as instruments of social change: A qualitative analysis of audience responses. Journal of Media Practice, 19(3), 181-198.
     Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. University of South Florida Scholar Commons.
     Google Scholar
  6. Bist, R. S. (2014). Fundamentals of research methodology and statistics. Pragati Publications.
     Google Scholar
  7. Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2013). Film art: An introduction (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
     Google Scholar
  8. Brown, A. (2018). The value of documentary film in academic exercise. Journal of Media Studies, 15(3), 45-59.
     Google Scholar
  9. Bruzzi, S. (2018). New documentary: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  10. Bruzzi, S., & Gibson, P. (2017). Introduction. In S. Bruzzi & P. Gibson (Eds.), Introduction to documentary (2nd ed., pp. 1-10). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  11. Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  12. Clark, E. R. (2018). Documentary ethics: A place for prudence. In R. P. Clair (Ed.), The documentary film book (pp. 287-301). Palgrave Macmillan.
     Google Scholar
  13. Clark, R. (2018). Documentary in action: A closer look at non-fiction film. Bloomsbury Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  14. Corner, J., & Rosenthal, A. (1991). The documentary film reader: History, theory, criticism. British Film Institute.
     Google Scholar
  15. Corner, J., & Rosenthal, A. (2015). New challenges for documentary (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
     Google Scholar
  16. Curtis, A. (Director) (2015). Bitter Lake. Full BBC Documentary https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/p02gyz6b/bitter-lake.
     Google Scholar
  17. Dovey, L. (2016). The qualities of a film director: An essential guide to the duties and responsibilities of a motion picture director (pp. 1-10). Intellect.
     Google Scholar
  18. Eckhardt, M. (2012). The documentary film as a source of academic research. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 1(1), 29-47.
     Google Scholar
  19. Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (5th ed.). Sage.
     Google Scholar
  20. Fitzgerald, T., & Lowe, L. (2020). Documentary film-making in the age of new media: From creative practices to distribution. Palgrave Macmillan.
     Google Scholar
  21. Gunnarsson, E. (2018). Academic exercises: Making the student visible in higher education in the learning society. Springer, Cham.
     Google Scholar
  22. Hurbis-Cherrier, M. (2013). Producing and directing the short film and video (5th ed.). CRC Press.
     Google Scholar
  23. Iwasaki, T. (2021). documentary film-making as academic work. Journal of Film and Video, 73(1), 1-10.
     Google Scholar
  24. Izod, J., & Kilborn, R. (2012). An introduction to television documentary: Confronting reality. Manchester University Press.
     Google Scholar
  25. Jagire, R. (2016). African documentary film: History and present. Routledge Handbook of Indian Cinemas (pp. 441-450). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, A. B., & Smith, C. D. (2019). Ethical considerations in academic research: A guide for researchers. Journal of Academic Ethics, 17(4), 327-342.
     Google Scholar
  27. Jones, L. (2015). The evolution of documentary film in academic contexts. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  28. Jutel, O. (2015). Sound and music in film and visual media: A critical overview. Bloomsbury Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  29. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers.
     Google Scholar
  30. Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press.
     Google Scholar
  31. Mangan, M. T., & Wilmot, D. J. (2015). Teaching with documentaries: Creating a replicable process for incorporating documentary film into academic exercises. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 49-61.
     Google Scholar
  32. McKernan, B. (2012). Documentary storytelling: Creative non-fiction on screen. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  33. Mühl, C. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
     Google Scholar
  34. Muyumba, W. (2015). African cinema and documentary modes of production. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  35. Neuman, W. L. (2016). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
     Google Scholar
  36. Nichols, B. (2002). Introduction to documentary (2nd ed.). Indiana University Press.
     Google Scholar
  37. Nichols, B. (2010). Problems and definitions (2nd ed.). Indiana University Press.
     Google Scholar
  38. Nichols, B. (2012). Documentary ethics: Expanding the terrain. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2422-2432.
     Google Scholar
  39. Nichols, B. (2017). Introduction to documentary (3rd ed.). Indiana University Press.
     Google Scholar
  40. Ojimelukwe, P., Anunobi, C. V., Okereke, C. C., & Nwosu, C. S. (2018). The role of academic research in Sustainable Development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 25(1), 50-56.
     Google Scholar
  41. Pedersen, S. B., & Jensen, H. M. (2019). The role of critical thinking, research, and communication skills in documentary film production. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(2), 35-50.
     Google Scholar
  42. Rascaroli, L. (2017). The personal camera: Subjective cinema and the essay film. Columbia University Press.
     Google Scholar
  43. Renov, M. (2013). The subject of documentary (2nd ed.). University of Minnesota Press.
     Google Scholar
  44. Rosenthal, A., & Eckhardt, B. (2016). Documentary media: History – Theory – Practice. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  45. Ruby, J. (2013). Ethics of documentary film-making. In M. Renov (Ed.), The documentary film reader: History, theory, criticism (2nd ed., pp. 197-210). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  46. Russell, N. (2018). The documentary handbook. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  47. Sam, D. L. (2012). The role of research in academic and non-academic contexts. Journal of Research Practice, 8(1), 1-11.
     Google Scholar
  48. Smith, J. (2010). Documentary film in academic exercise. Journal of Film Studies, 20(2), 45-59.
     Google Scholar
  49. Strohmaier, D. (2018). From story idea to TV production: A producer's guide. Taylor & Francis.
     Google Scholar
  50. Winston, B. (2013). Claiming the real II: Documentary: Grierson and beyond. British Film Institute.
     Google Scholar
  51. Wisker, G. (2018). The postgraduate research handbook: Succeed with your MA, MPhil, EdD and PhD (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
     Google Scholar