Research Article

Factors that Influence Willingness to Pay for Theatre Performances: The Case of Lithuanian National Drama Theatre

Rusne Kregzdaite
Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania
* Corresponding author
DOI icon 10.24018/ejmedia.2022.1.1.2

Read Counter
562

Downloads
161

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2022-08-09
Published 2022-09-08

Read counter = 562 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Cultural sector has a dual impact on the socio-economic system: the economic value (expressed in terms of market relations) and the cultural (non-market) value indirectly contributes to the welfare of the state through changes in societal values, creativity transformations and cultural needs of the country. Measurement of indirect (cultural value) impacts is difficult, but in the case of the cultural sector (especially when it comes to economically inefficient state-funded culture), it helps to reveal the essential characteristics.

The study aims to analyse the value of cultural organisations that are invisible in market processes. This was done by analysing the usefulness of the consumer, incorporating not only the price paid but also the social and cultural decision-making factors that determine the spectator's choice (time dedicated for a visit, additional costs, content, previous experiences, and corporate image). This may reflect the consumer's real choice to consume (all the costs he incurs may be considered the financial equivalent of his experience with the cultural establishment).

Methodology was tested by applying methods to Lithuanian national drama theatre (LNDT) case. The empirical research consisted of a survey (more than 800 participants) of LNDT visitors. The willingness to pay and travel costs methods were used. Analysis of different performances lets identify the factor that increases willingness to pay for the performance and affects theatre attendance. The research stresses the importance of cultural value and social perspective of the cultural sector and relates it to the discussions of public funding of culture.

Keywords: contingent valuation, performing arts, travel costs, willigness to pay

References

  1. Angelini, F. & Castellani, M. (2019). Cultural and economic value: a critical review. Journal of cultural economics, 43, 173-188.
     Google Scholar
  2. Armbrecht, J. (2014). Use value of cultural experiences: A comparison of contingent valuation and travel cost. Tourism Management, 42, 141-148.
     Google Scholar
  3. Arts and Humanities Research Council. (2015). Measuring Economic Value in Cultural Institutions , s.l.: s.n.
     Google Scholar
  4. Budzinski, W., Czaijkowski, M. W. (2016). Melpomene in Need. Site Choice model for Theatres in Warshaw. Valladolid: ACEI International conference on cultural economics.
     Google Scholar
  5. DCMS. (2010). Measuring the value of culture: a report to the Department for Culture Media and Sport, s.l.: DCMS.
     Google Scholar
  6. Dekker, E. (2014). Two approaches to study the value of art and culture, and the emergence of a third. Journal of cultural economics, 39(4), 309-326.
     Google Scholar
  7. Fujiwara, D., Lawton, R. N. & Mourato, S. (2019). More than a good book: contingent valuation of public library services in England. Journal of cultural economics, 43, 639-666.
     Google Scholar
  8. Giannakopoulou, S., Damigos, D. & Kaliampakos, D. (2018). Investigating the issue of hypothetical bias in Contingent Valuation studies. Evidence from built heritage evaluation, in favor of CVM's validity. s.l., 20th International Conference in Cultural Economics.
     Google Scholar
  9. Grisolia, J.M, Willis, K. (2011). Heterogeneity in willingness-to-pay for theatre productions: Individual specific willingness-to-pay estimates for theatres, shows and their attributes. Scottish Journal of Political Economy.
     Google Scholar
  10. Hansen, T. B. (1997). The Willingness-to-Pay for the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen as a Public Good. Journal of cultural economics, 21, 1-28.
     Google Scholar
  11. Holden, J. (2015). The Ecology of Culture, s.l.: Arts & Humanites Research Council.
     Google Scholar
  12. Hutter, M. & Frey, B. S. (2010). On the Influence of Cultural Value on Economic Value. Revue d’économie politique, 1, 35-46.
     Google Scholar
  13. Hutter, M. & Shusterman, R. (2006). Value and the valuation of art in economic and esthetic theory. In: V. A. Ginsburg & D. Throsby, eds. Hanbook of the Economics of Arts and Culture Volume 1. s.l.:North Holland, pp. 170-205.
     Google Scholar
  14. Klamer, A. (1996). The Value of Culture On the Relationship between Economics and Arts. s.l.:Amsterdam University Press.
     Google Scholar
  15. Klamer, A. (2016). Doing the right thing. A value based economy. s.l.:De brink.
     Google Scholar
  16. Martinette Kruger, M. S. (2016). Are you willing to pay more for the arts?. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences , 9(2), pp. 392-408.
     Google Scholar
  17. Melstrom, R. (2014). Valuing historic battlefields: an application of the travel cost method to three American Civil War battlefields. Journal of cultural economics, 38(3), 223-236.
     Google Scholar
  18. Noonan, D. S. (2003). Contingent Valuation and Cultural Resources: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature. Journal of cultural economics, 27, 159-176.
     Google Scholar
  19. Noonan, D. S. (2004). Valuing arts and culture: a research agenda for contingent valuation.. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 34(3), 205-221.
     Google Scholar
  20. Oancea, A., Florez-Petour, T. & Atkinson, J. (2018). The ecologies and economy of cultural value from research. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 24(1), 1-24.
     Google Scholar
  21. Poor, P. J. & Smith, J. M, (2004. Travel Cost Analysis of a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case of Historic St. Mary's City of Maryland. Journal of cultural economics, 28, 217-229.
     Google Scholar
  22. Tanguy, M. & Kumar, V. (2018). Measuring the extent to which Londoners are willing to pay for public art in their city. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
     Google Scholar
  23. Throsby, D. (2000). Economics and culture. s.l.:Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  24. Throsby, D. (2003). Determining the Value of Cultural Goods: How Much (or How Little) Does Contingent Valuation Tell Us?. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 275-285.
     Google Scholar
  25. Throsby, D. (2008). The concentric circles model of thec cultural industries. Cultural Trends, pp. 147-164.
     Google Scholar
  26. Tohmo, T. (2017). Looking for determinants of willingness-to-pay for Sibelius Hall, Lahti. Cogent Arts & Humanities, Volume 4.
     Google Scholar
  27. UNCTAD. (2008). Creative Economy. Report 2008, s.l.: United Nations.
     Google Scholar
  28. UNESCO, (2016). Konvencija dėl kultūros raiškos įvairovės apsaugos ir skatinimo. Veiklos gairės, s.l.: Lietuvos nacionalinė UNESCO komisija.
     Google Scholar
  29. Wheatley, D. & Bickerton, C. (2019). Measuring changes in subjective well being from engagement in the arts, culture and sport. Journal of cultural economics, 43, 421-442.
     Google Scholar
  30. Willis, K. G., Snowball, J. D., Wymer, C. & Grisolía, J. (2012). A count data travel cost model of theatre demand using aggregate theatre booking data. Journal of cultural economics, 36(2), 91-112.
     Google Scholar
  31. Wisniewska, A., Budzinski, W. & Czajkows, M. (2016). Melpomene in need. Site choice model | Case study: theatres in Warsaw. Valladolid, 19th International Conference on Cultural Economics.
     Google Scholar